Hi...

Hope you can look into this issue. It can be a little annoying when your favourite performer is in a private and you cannot even drop them a quicky message. I appreciate that the client first-in does have exclusivity so, it may be good to have an additional feature to be able to send one (1) or two (2) messages to a performer only when in voyeur mode and for a fee (of like 100 credits per message) if you need to share something, rather than use the standard messaging system.

Thanks in advance! Cheers, J Quote

Hi...
Hope you can look into this issue. It can be a little annoying when your favourite performer is in a private and you cannot even drop them a quicky message. I appreciate that the client first-in does have exclusivity so, it may be good to have an additional feature to be able to send one (1) or two (2) messages to a performer only when in voyeur mode and for a fee (of like 100 credits per message) if you need to share something, rather than use the standard messaging system.
Thanks in advance! Cheers, J


Personally and quite frankly I think this is an absolutely ridiculous idea, a non-starter and trust that it will never be implemented.

By definition and the whole purpose of a Private is a one on one experience and a Voyeur is a watcher only.

As such a model should not be distracted by other people messaging them and more than likely making comments and requests.

It is frustrating enough to have gone Private and then the model to be distracted by other models working alongside them or the studio manager entering the actual room, let alone reading messages from others.

Has this idea been thought through? Can you imagine in the real life having sex with a "partner" and some third party passing comments/requests? Maybe would be a turn on for some but not me.

If it is only favorites that you refer to, are on such good terms with them and it is imperative that you message them when they are working, perhaps you should request them only to do Multi-User shows then everybody would know where they are.



When formulating these comments it came to mind that a more important issue is the matter of the models who transmit on several websites.
Frequently, although a Private may have been started on F4F where the cost per minute is quite substantial users on other sites, where the cost of credits is a fraction of the price here, can enter the room, join in fully with the so called private albeit their chat and presence being invisible to the f4f member and others.
Having paid for an exclusive Private it is frustrating, when credits have run out or the Private has supposedly ended, only to find the curtains remaining closed and the private continuing on another site and knowing that it has not been an exclusive one on one experience albeit with voyeurs.
On one particular other site where any (invisible to others in the room) can join in a private I believe a model has the ability to make the private actually private, one on one.
Should this not be automatic when a Private is instigated from F4F, a premium site?


Quote

Dear Heart of England...

That is a fair point. I understand what you mean. I have managed to short-circuit the issue by having the private/personal emails of all the performers with whom I share a closer connection.

Regarding your point, I completely concur. I understand that this is an issue, and a number of performers openly admit that they have a split-cam or are servicing users on other sites simultaneously. That said, I am not certain how that can be effectively policed or indeed resolved, and I would even suspect that this is more of a customer service issue rather than a techical one.

I have several pertinent customer service issues but will raise them via email or phone with customer service... Thanks again! Quote